Loading

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

The Nation's Premier Civil and Human Rights Coalition

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights  & The Leadership Conference Education Fund
The Nation's Premier Civil and Human Rights Coalition

Parent and Family Engagement in the Every Student Succeeds Act

Advocacy Letter - 04/27/16

Source: The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Recipient: John King


View the PDF of this letter here.

The Honorable John B. King, Jr.
Secretary
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20202

Re: Parent and Family Engagement in the Every Student Succeeds Act

Dear Secretary King,

On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the 25 undersigned organizations, we would like to highlight the importance of meaningful parent and community consultation in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). The Leadership Conference is a coalition charged by its diverse membership of more than 200 national organizations to promote and protect the civil and human rights of all persons in the United States. The civil rights community sees implementation of ESSA as an opportunity to take steps to ensure equity for underserved students as long as communities are engaged in decision-making and policy is informed by the perspectives of diverse communities.

Since its inception, the intent of the ESEA has been to raise achievement for low-income and otherwise disadvantaged children. Parent and community engagement have been central requirements of the law for decades.  Although required, this key piece of the law has not often, or even frequently, been meaningfully implemented.  In 1969, a report titled “Is it Helping Poor Children? Title I of ESEA” highlighted key concerns within the early implementation of ESEA, including specifically the lack of parent involvement in the development of Title I programs. Authors Ruby Martin and Phyllis McClure highlighted the importance of parent and community engagement:

“No educational effort can truly succeed apart from the community in which the students live. The Office of Education recognizes this and requires that each local district provide for the maximum practical involvement of parents in the design, planning, operation, and evaluation of Title I programs. Some appropriate vehicle for community involvement, such as a Title I advisory committee, must be established by school systems, with at least half of the committee composed of parents and representatives of community agencies serving the poor community. The Title I program itself should include activities and services in which parents may be involved.”

This 1969 report reinforces the importance of parent and community engagement in student success. From then to today, there remains clear congressional intent to incorporate parents and community stakeholders in developing educational plans for students, schools, districts and states. However, not all states, districts or schools meaningfully engage parents and community stakeholders. Often times, the families of girls and boys of color, English Learners, students with disabilities,  American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian students, low-income students and those who are migrant, homeless, in foster care or returning from or placed in juvenile detention, or who are LGBTQ are not seen or valued as vital participants. As such, they are left out of critical decision-making processes and the needs of their children are not represented in plans and policies. 

As you stated during the first day of Department of Education’s (ED) negotiated rulemaking meeting, the ESSA is a civil rights law at its core. You prefaced that the dialogue negotiators embark in will be complicated and technical at times, “but our North Star must be equality of opportunity.” We agree with you and believe the first step to equality of opportunity is equality of engagement. The civil rights community is looking forward to robust regulations governing meaningful engagement in the ESSA, especially as it relates to the development of state and district plans. Since states and districts have historically failed to incorporate meaningful engagement, we have provided suggestions.

In order for each type of engagement to be “meaningful” it must meet the following criteria:

  • Engagement is meaningful when it occurs at the earliest possible stage, prior to the development of a program, initiative, or policy to ensure families of underserved students, communities, and stakeholder views are integrated.
  • Engagement is most effective when it is seen and understood as a process which requires continuous input and discussion.
  • Meaningful engagement is based on open dialogue and coordination that actively seeks and considers the views of all participants, and then seeking agreement on how to proceed.
  • Meaningful engagement necessitates minimum requirements and expectations with respect to consultation along with the establishment of measurable outcomes.  

Based on the criteria above, we request the Department of Education to define:

  1. Meaningful consultation with parents, families, and community stakeholders
  2. Meaningful consultation with tribes and tribal organizations

The distinction between these two types of consultation derives from the fact that tribes are sovereign nations who have a government-to-government relationship with the U.S. government. We recommend that ED use its “Consultation and Coordination with American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Governments” outlined policy as the basis of its regulations on tribal consultation.

Meaningful community engagement, both the process and product, is the foundation that will best support all of our students. We encourage ED to think of engagement in the context of developing a positive relationship between states, local districts, tribes, and community stakeholders. A key component in working and supporting underserved youth is building trust, which the civil rights community can help facilitate.

Attached is a list of contacts at our organizations that can support engagement efforts with states and local districts. We encourage ED to utilize and share this list when executing meaningful community engagement efforts. If states do not meaningfully engage families and community stakeholders while implementing ESSA, we will have missed a crucial opportunity and the students we represent will continue to be denied the full protections they are entitled to under federal law. The stakes are high, family engagement is critical to closing the achievement gap, and our children deserve our best.

We look forward to working alongside the Department of Education, state departments of education, school districts and schools to inform implementation of this law at the federal, state, and local level. If you have any questions, please contact Dimple Patel, National Indian Education Association (NIEA) Federal Policy Associate at dpatel@niea.org or Liz King, The Leadership Conference Director of Education Policy at king@civilrights.org.

Sincerely,

National Indian Education Association

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

Afterschool Alliance

Children’s Defense Fund

Coalition for Community Schools

Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates

Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund

Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law

Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

League of United Latin American Citizens

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

National Center for Learning Disabilities

National Council of La Raza

National Down Syndrome Congress

National Urban League

National Women’s Law Center

New Leaders

Partners for Each and Every Child

Southeast Asia Resource Action Center

TASH

Teach for America

Teach Plus

The New Teacher Project

United College Negro Fund

United Way Worldwide


Engagement Contacts

Name

Email Address

Organization

  1. Luis Torres

Latorres@lulac.org

League of United Latin American Citizens

  1. Susan Henderson

shenderson@dredf.org

Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund

  1. Hilary Shelton

hoshelton@naacpnet.org

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

  1. Ricki Sabia

rickisabia@gmail.com

National Down Syndrome

  1. Molly Mauer

Molly@theopportunityinstitute.org

The Opportunity Institute

  1. Shree Chauhan

schauhan@nul.org

National Urban League

  1. Kenya Bradshaw

Kenya.bradshaw@tntp.org

The New Teacher Project

  1. Kelly Broughan

Kelly.Broughan@teachforamerica.org

Teach for America

  1. Grace Francis

Glucyf6@gmail.com

TASH

  1. Denise Marshall

Denise@copaa.org

Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates

  1. Soncia Coleman

Sonica.coleman@unitedway.org

United Way Worldwide

  1. Brenda Coleman

bcalderon@nclr.org

National Council of La Raza

  1. Kim Hymes

Khymes@ncld.org

National Center for Learning Disabilities

  1. Anjali Thakur-Mittal

ThakurMittal@civilrights.org

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

  1. MaryLee Allen

mallen@childrensdefense.org

Children’s Defense Fund

  1. Cheryl Smith

Cheryl.smith@uncf.org

United Negro College Fund

  1. Mary Kingston Roche

rochem@iel.org

Institute for Educational Leadership

  1. Rita Pin Ahrens

rita@searac.org

Southeast  Asia Resource Action Center

  1. Erik Peterson

Epeterson@afterschoolalliance.org

Afterschool Alliance

  1. Ahniwake Rose

Arose@niea.org

National Indian Education Association

  1. Alice Cain

ajohnsoncain@teachplus.org

Teach Plus

Our Members