Health Care Reform Must Stop Insurance Companies from Denying Coverage for Pre-Existing Conditions
September 18, 2009 - Posted by Tyler Lewis
The health insurance industry's widespread use of "pre-existing conditions" is unfair and discriminatory. These conditions are often illnesses, injuries, or diseases that will not be covered under certain health insurance plans, or in some cases, can prevent a person from getting health insurance at all.
Recently, the National Women's Law Center issued a report on just how broadly health insurance companies define "pre-existing condition" (PDF) to avoid paying for people's treatment and how those practices discriminate against women. Currently, in eight states and the District of Columbia being a victim of domestic abuse qualifies as having a pre-existing condition, allowing insurers to deny coverage to women who have been abused in the past.
Both versions of the health reform bills currently being considered in Congress would ban insurance companies from using pre-existing conditions to deny coverage, guaranteeing that this egregious practice would be stopped.
"It is unconscionable that health insurance companies would deny coverage to a woman who has been the victim of domestic violence. This extraordinary and discriminatory practice is just one more example of how badly broken the system is and why Congress must pass health care reform legislation this fall," said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of LCCR.
Related Posts
Census Data Show Effectiveness of Low-Income Programs; But Racial Disparities, Inequality Persist - 9/12/12
Advocates Say Proposed Medicaid Changes Would Disproportionately Hurt Vulnerable Communities - 6/10/11
Supreme Court Orders California to Reduce Its Prison Population, Address Civil Rights Violations - 5/24/11
Campaign for Better Care and Federal Government Launch Initiatives Encourage Better Hospital Care - 4/14/11
- Categories:


The Leadership Conference is working diligently to see that Tom Perez is confirmed as U.S. Secretary of Labor. Perez is an eminently qualified public servant and consensus builder who has dedicated his career to ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly and have the opportunity to succeed. He has served with integrity and distinction at the local, state and national level, compiling an outstanding record of achievement. 

