Why You Should Care About Human RightsCivil rights and human rights have always been intertwined. At the heart of the civil rights movement is the basic human dignity of all people and their right to live in freedom and with justice and equal opportunity. Impact International human rights covenants can be used to push the U.S. Government to focus on issues not redressable under U.S. law, or to establish stronger remedies than are available under U.S. law. The U.S. ratified the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination in 1994, and under that agreement this country has a responsibility to remedy discrimination, both intentional and unintentional, that disproportionately affects minorities. Thus, human rights may reach areas our civil rights cannot reach. Consider the following outlined in The Leadership Conference/The Education Fund report on racial disparities in the criminal justice system, "Justice on Trial":
Our civil rights laws abolished Jim Crow laws and other vestiges of segregation, and guaranteed minority citizens the right to travel and utilize public accommodations freely. Yet today, racial profiling and police brutality make such travel hazardous to the dignity and health of law-abiding black and Hispanic citizens. Background Many critical issues of racism and racial discrimination continue to face people all over the globe. These include issues disparate treatment in the criminal justice system; unequal education, health care and employment; the rise in hate crimes; and discrimination based on sexual orientation. The civil rights community has petitioned the United Nations for redress in the past - in 1947, the NAACP joined other U.S, civil rights groups in presenting one of the very first individual human rights appeals ever submitted to the United Nations. At the same time, this avenue for advocacy has been historically underused by U.S. NGOs. Other nations regularly make use of the UN to highlight their domestic issues. In today's world, the use of international means for advocacy will become even more relevant. Recently, three civil rights leaders - Julian Bond of the NAACP, Wade Henderson of The Leadership Conference, and Dr. Mary Frances Berry of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, presented a "Call to Action" to the United Nations in Geneva. This call highlighted the persistence of human rights violations in the U.S., notably in the form of race bias in the application of the criminal justice system. The document presented was signed by more than 45 civil rights leaders in the United States. Julian Bond formerly addressed the U.N. Sub Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. At the conclusion of the presentation, the Sub-Commission erupted in applause, in recognition of the import of the statement. The U.N. Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) presents another example of the use of international means for the protection of civil rights. CEDAW establishes a world-wide strategy for advancing equality between the sexes. Supporters of the women's treaty observe that it urges nations to remove barriers to equality in education, employment, and health care as well as legal and commercial relations. CEDAW will have no direct effect on the U.S. legal system, proponents say, because its provisions are consistent with current U.S. law and it is not "self-executing." But ratification will strengthen our solidarity with women around the world who are still struggling for their basic human rights. |