Skip to main content

Civilrights.org

Civilrights.org: The Civil Rights coalition for the 21st century. Over 180 national organizations strong.
Founded by LCCR and LCCREF
Issues

Search This Site

CivilRights.org > Library > Advocacy Letters

Support Fair and Rational Sentencing by Eliminating the Sentencing Disparities between Crack and Power Cocaine

Advocacy Letter
Source: Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
Recipient: Representatives
Date: 02/14/08

On behalf the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR), the nation’s oldest,

largest, and most diverse civil and human rights coalition, we urge you to eliminate the

sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine. In the wake of recent changes

to the federal sentencing guidelines and recommendations by the U.S. Sentencing

Commission (USSC), several worthy reform bills have been introduced in Congress and

we urge you to support them. There is substantial bipartisan recognition that the

mandatory minimum statute treating one gram of crack cocaine the same as 100 grams of

powder cocaine must be corrected and only Congress can do so.

The Crack Cocaine Equitable Sentencing Act of 2007 (H.R. 460), introduced by

Rep. Rangel (D-NY), and the Drug Sentencing Reform and Cocaine Kingpin Trafficking

Act of 2007 (H.R. 4545), introduced by Rep. Jackson Lee (D-TX) and Rep. Shays (RCT),

call for rational reform of crack cocaine penalties. These proposals also begin the

process of shifting the federal law enforcement focus from low-level street sellers toward

higher-level traffickers. They eliminate the disparity in federal sentencing for crack

versus powder cocaine offenses, without a shift in the current powder cocaine penalty.

They also bring crack sentencing inline with powder cocaine, as well as with all other

drugs, by applying mandatory minimums only to dealers and not those convicted of

simple possession.

The Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2008 (H.R. 5035), introduced by Rep.

Scott (D-VA), also represents an important step toward fair and rational drug sentencing.

The bill includes the reintroduction of probation into the system to allow for limited

discretion in individual cases where officials are confident that an offender has been

rehabilitated. We applaud and support the bill as an important first step toward fair and

rational sentencing for all drug offenses.

Attention to reform of crack cocaine sentences has gained momentum over the

past several months. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the USSC’s guidelines, further

highlighting the need for reform. Indeed, President Bush recently commuted the prison

sentence of an individual convicted of a crack offense who had served 15 years of his 19

year sentence. A change in the mandatory minimum crack statutes, however, can only

occur legislatively. Eliminating the 100 to 1 disparity is long overdue.

Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

Page 2

We ask that you co-sponsor H.R. 460, H.R. 4545, and H.R. 5035 and expeditiously end

these gross injustices in our system of justice. If you have any questions, please contact Nancy

Zirkin, at (202) 263-2880 or David Goldberg, Senior Counsel, at (202) 466-0087, regarding this

or any other issue.

Sincerely,

Wade Henderson Nancy Zirkin

President & CEO Executive Vice President

© 2008 Leadership Conference on Civil Rights/Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund. All rights reserved.
1629 K Street NW, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20006